| Title |
Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Basic Research in Cardiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00395-016-0588-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek J. Hausenloy, Jose A. Barrabes, Hans Erik Bøtker, Sean M. Davidson, Fabio Di Lisa, James Downey, Thomas Engstrom, Péter Ferdinandy, Hector A. Carbrera-Fuentes, Gerd Heusch, Borja Ibanez, Efstathios K. Iliodromitis, Javier Inserte, Robert Jennings, Neena Kalia, Rajesh Kharbanda, Sandrine Lecour, Michael Marber, Tetsuji Miura, Michel Ovize, Miguel A. Perez-Pinzon, Hans Michael Piper, Karin Przyklenk, Michael Rahbek Schmidt, Andrew Redington, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Gemma Vilahur, Jakob Vinten-Johansen, Derek M. Yellon, David Garcia-Dorado |
| Abstract |
To commemorate the auspicious occasion of the 30th anniversary of IPC, leading pioneers in the field of cardioprotection gathered in Barcelona in May 2016 to review and discuss the history of IPC, its evolution to IPost and RIC, myocardial reperfusion injury as a therapeutic target, and future targets and strategies for cardioprotection. This article provides an overview of the major topics discussed at this special meeting and underscores the huge importance and impact, the discovery of IPC has made in the field of cardiovascular research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#582,632
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#6
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,540
of 315,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them