↓ Skip to main content

'Keeping the plates spinning': a qualitative study of the complexity, barriers, and facilitators to caregiving in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
'Keeping the plates spinning': a qualitative study of the complexity, barriers, and facilitators to caregiving in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, June 2022
DOI 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare R Pearson, Faye Forsyth, Eva Khair, Emma Sowden, Susana Borja Boluda, Christi Deaton, Mollika Chakravorty, Sophie Maclachlan, Edward Kane, Jessica Odone, Natasha Thorley, Susana Borja-Boluda, Ian Wellwood, Emma Sowden, Thomas Blakeman, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Muhammed Hossain, John Sharpley, Brain Gordon, Joanna Taffe, Aaron Long, Affan Aziz, Hannah Swayze, Heather Rutter, Chris Schramm, Sine MacDonald, Helena Papworth, Julie Smith, Craig Needs, David Cronk, Chris Newark, Duncan Blake, Alistair Brown, Amman Basuita, Emma Gayton, Victoria Glover, Robin Fox, Jonathan Crawshaw, Helen Ashdown, Christine A’Court, Rachael Ayerst, Basilio Hernandez-Diaz, Kyle Knox, Nick Wooding, Shamila Wanninayake, Christopher Keast, Adam Jones, Katherine Brown, Gaw Matthew, Nick Thomas, Sharon Dixon, Elisabetta Angeleri-Rand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,193,643
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#267
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,503
of 434,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.