↓ Skip to main content

Unraveling the complexities of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) immune regulation in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Unraveling the complexities of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) immune regulation in health and disease
Published in
Immunologic Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12026-011-8210-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sreemanti Basu, Bonnie N. Dittel

Abstract

It has become clear that the endocannabinoid system is a potent regulator of immune responses, with the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) as the key component due to its high expression by all immune subtypes. CB2 has been shown to regulate immunity by a number of mechanisms including development, migration, proliferation, and effector functions. In addition, CB2 has been shown to modulate the function of all immune cell types examined to date. CB2 is a G(i)-protein-coupled receptor and thus exhibits a complex pharmacology allowing both stimulatory and inhibitory signaling that depends on receptor expression levels, ligand concentration, and cell lineage specificities. Here, we discuss both in vitro and in vivo experimental evidence that CB2 is a potent regulator of immune responses making it a prime target for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 9%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 57 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,809,950
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#78
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,230
of 114,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.