↓ Skip to main content

Successful 10-second one-legged stance performance predicts survival in middle-aged and older individuals

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 7,382)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Successful 10-second one-legged stance performance predicts survival in middle-aged and older individuals
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105360
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Objectives Balance quickly diminishes after the mid-50s increasing the risk for falls and other adverse health outcomes. Our aim was to assess whether the ability to complete a 10- s one-legged stance (10-second OLS) is associated with all-cause mortality and whether it adds relevant prognostic information beyond ordinary demographic, anthropometric and clinical data. Methods Anthropometric, clinical and vital status and 10-s OLS data were assessed in 1702 individuals (68% men) aged 51-75 years between 2008 and 2020. Log-rank and Cox modelling were used to compare survival curves and risk of death according to ability (YES) or inability (NO) to complete the 10-s OLS test. Results Overall, 20.4% of the individuals were classified as NO. During a median follow-up of 7 years, 7.2% died, with 4.6% (YES) and 17.5% (NO) on the 10-s OLS. Survival curves were worse for NO 10-s OLS (log-rank test=85.6; p

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 538 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Professor 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 70 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Sports and Recreations 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 75 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,217
of 34,414,017 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#7
of 7,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 470,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,414,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.