↓ Skip to main content

How well do reanalyses represent the southern African precipitation?

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How well do reanalyses represent the southern African precipitation?
Published in
Climate Dynamics, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1423-z
Authors

Qiong Zhang, Heiner Körnich, Karin Holmgren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 31%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 37%
Environmental Science 25 22%
Engineering 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,197
of 4,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,339
of 164,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#43
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.