↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB and STAT3 signaling pathways collaboratively link inflammation to cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
520 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
NF-κB and STAT3 signaling pathways collaboratively link inflammation to cancer
Published in
Protein & Cell, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13238-013-2084-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yihui Fan, Renfang Mao, Jianhua Yang

Abstract

Although links between cancer and inflammation were firstly proposed in the nineteenth century, the molecular mechanism has not yet been clearly understood. Epidemiological studies have identified chronic infections and inflammation as major risk factors for various types of cancer. NF-κB transcription factors and the signaling pathways are central coordinators in innate and adaptive immune responses. STAT3 regulates the expression of a variety of genes in response to cellular stimuli, and thus plays a key role in cell growth and apoptosis. Recently, roles of NF-κB and STAT3 in colon, gastric and liver cancers have been extensively investigated. The activation and interaction between STAT3 and NF-κB play vital roles in control of the communication between cancer cells and inflammatory cells. NF-κB and STAT3 are two major factors controlling the ability of pre-neoplastic and malignant cells to resist apoptosis-based tumor-surveillance and regulating tumor angiogenesis and invasiveness. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of NF-κB and STAT3 cooperation in cancer will offer opportunities for the design of new chemo-preventive and chemotherapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 313 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 22%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 77 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 91 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,393,125
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#81
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,296
of 197,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them