↓ Skip to main content

An Extended Intervening Process Model

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resource Development Review, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Extended Intervening Process Model
Published in
Human Resource Development Review, May 2012
DOI 10.1177/1534484312444429
Authors

John Qin, Kosmas X. Smyrnios, Ling Deng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 35%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 19 26%
Psychology 13 18%
Social Sciences 11 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,148,117
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Human Resource Development Review
#114
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,554
of 163,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resource Development Review
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.