| Title |
Problem Conceptualisation Using Idea Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systemic Practice and Action Research, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11213-006-9056-y |
| Authors |
Mike Metcalfe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 8% |
| Design | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#30
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,282
of 78,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them