↓ Skip to main content

Dose‐Dependent Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Blood Lipids in Statin‐Treated Hyperlipidaemic Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
20 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Dose‐Dependent Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Blood Lipids in Statin‐Treated Hyperlipidaemic Subjects
Published in
Lipids, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11745-006-3014-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara J. Meyer, Tone Hammervold, Arild Chr. Rustan, Peter R. C. Howe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,729,343
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#610
of 1,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,596
of 163,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.