↓ Skip to main content

Degeneration of the cervical disc: histology compared with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Degeneration of the cervical disc: histology compared with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Neuroradiology, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00234-005-1412-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Christe, R. Läubli, R. Guzman, U. Berlemann, R. J. Moore, G. Schroth, P. Vock, K. O. Lövblad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 57%
Engineering 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#306
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,460
of 58,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them