↓ Skip to main content

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Autistic Traits in the UK, India and Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Autistic Traits in the UK, India and Malaysia
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1808-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Freeth, Elizabeth Sheppard, Rajani Ramachandran, Elizabeth Milne

Abstract

The disorder of autism is widely recognised throughout the world. However, the diagnostic criteria and theories of autism are based on research predominantly conducted in Western cultures. Here we compare the expression of autistic traits in a sample of neurotypical individuals from one Western culture (UK) and two Eastern cultures (India and Malaysia), using the Autism-spectrum Quotient (AQ) in order to identify possible cultural differences in the expression of autistic traits. Behaviours associated with autistic traits were reported to a greater extent in the Eastern cultures than the Western culture. Males scored higher than females and science students scored higher than non-science students in each culture. Indian students scored higher than both other groups on the Imagination sub-scale, Malaysian students scored higher than both other groups on the Attention Switching sub-scale. The underlying factor structures of the AQ for each population were derived and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 17%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 40 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 44%
Social Sciences 24 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 55 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,629,788
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,441
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,532
of 198,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.