↓ Skip to main content

JobTIPS: A Transition to Employment Program for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
Title
JobTIPS: A Transition to Employment Program for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1800-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorothy C. Strickland, Claire D. Coles, Louise B. Southern

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of an internet accessed training program that included Theory of Mind-based guidance, video models, visual supports, and virtual reality practice sessions in teaching appropriate job interview skills to individuals with high functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders. In a randomized study, twenty-two youth, ages 16-19, were evaluated during two employment interviews. Half received a training intervention following the initial interview and the half who served as a contrast group did not. Their performance pre and post intervention was assessed by four independent raters using a scale that included evaluation of both Content and Delivery. Results suggest that youth who completed the JobTIPS employment program demonstrated significantly more effective verbal content skills than those who did not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 398 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 16%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 113 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 19%
Social Sciences 53 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 8%
Computer Science 16 4%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 131 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,810,866
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#792
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,720
of 198,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#12
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.