↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
496 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
862 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua N. Cobb, Genevieve DeClerck, Anthony Greenberg, Randy Clark, Susan McCouch

Abstract

More accurate and precise phenotyping strategies are necessary to empower high-resolution linkage mapping and genome-wide association studies and for training genomic selection models in plant improvement. Within this framework, the objective of modern phenotyping is to increase the accuracy, precision and throughput of phenotypic estimation at all levels of biological organization while reducing costs and minimizing labor through automation, remote sensing, improved data integration and experimental design. Much like the efforts to optimize genotyping during the 1980s and 1990s, designing effective phenotyping initiatives today requires multi-faceted collaborations between biologists, computer scientists, statisticians and engineers. Robust phenotyping systems are needed to characterize the full suite of genetic factors that contribute to quantitative phenotypic variation across cells, organs and tissues, developmental stages, years, environments, species and research programs. Next-generation phenotyping generates significantly more data than previously and requires novel data management, access and storage systems, increased use of ontologies to facilitate data integration, and new statistical tools for enhancing experimental design and extracting biologically meaningful signal from environmental and experimental noise. To ensure relevance, the implementation of efficient and informative phenotyping experiments also requires familiarity with diverse germplasm resources, population structures, and target populations of environments. Today, phenotyping is quickly emerging as the major operational bottleneck limiting the power of genetic analysis and genomic prediction. The challenge for the next generation of quantitative geneticists and plant breeders is not only to understand the genetic basis of complex trait variation, but also to use that knowledge to efficiently synthesize twenty-first century crop varieties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Belgium 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 810 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 197 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 183 21%
Student > Master 117 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 5%
Student > Bachelor 47 5%
Other 135 16%
Unknown 136 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 517 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 6%
Computer Science 29 3%
Engineering 22 3%
Environmental Science 19 2%
Other 58 7%
Unknown 169 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,916,590
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,400
of 3,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,090
of 201,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.