↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Association Between School Climate and Future Orientation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Association Between School Climate and Future Orientation
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0321-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Lindstrom Johnson, Elise Pas, Catherine P. Bradshaw

Abstract

Promoting students' future orientation is inherently a goal of the educational system. Recently, it has received more explicit attention given the increased focus on career readiness. This study aimed to examine the association between school climate and adolescents' report of future orientation using data from youth (N = 27,698; 49.4 % female) across 58 high schools. Three-level hierarchical linear models indicated that perceptions of available emotional and service supports, rules and consequences, and parent engagement were positively related to adolescents' future orientation. Additionally, the school-level average future orientation was significantly related to individuals' future orientation, indicating a potential influence of contextual effects on this construct. Taken together, these findings suggest that interventions targeting school climate may hold promise for promoting future orientation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 14%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Lecturer 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 32%
Social Sciences 17 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,823,414
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#601
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,011
of 267,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.