↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11060-011-0677-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes E. Wolff, Michael E. Rytting, Tribhawan S. Vats, Peter E. Zage, Joann L. Ater, Shiao Woo, John Kuttesch, Leena Ketonen, Anita Mahajan

Abstract

Recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) are traditionally treated with palliative care since no effective treatments have been described for these tumors. Recently, clinical studies have been emerging, and individualized treatment is attempted more frequently. However, an informative way to compare the treatment outcomes has not been established, and historical control data are missing for recurrent disease. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent DIPG treated between 1998 and 2010. Response progression-free survival and possible influencing factors were evaluated. Thirty-one patients were identified who were treated in 61 treatment attempts using 26 treatment elements in 31 different regimens. The most frequently used drugs were etoposide (14), bevacizumab (13), irinotecan (13), nimotuzumab (13), and valproic acid (13). Seven patients had repeat radiation therapy to the primary tumor. Response was recorded after 58 treatment attempts and was comprised of 0 treatment attempts with complete responses, 7 with partial responses, 20 with stable diseases, and 31 with progressive diseases The median progression-free survival after treatment start was 0.16 years (2 months) and was found to be correlated to the prior time to progression but not to the number of previous treatment attempts. Repeat radiation resulted in the highest response rates (4/7), and the longest progression-free survival. These data provide a basis to plan future clinical trials for recurrent DIPG. Repeat radiation therapy should be tested in a prospective clinical study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Other 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,448,929
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#165
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,485
of 123,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.