↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring potential prostate cancer biomarkers in urine by capillary electrophoresis–tandem mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography A, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring potential prostate cancer biomarkers in urine by capillary electrophoresis–tandem mass spectrometry
Published in
Journal of Chromatography A, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laiel C. Soliman, Yu Hui, Amitha K. Hewavitharana, David D.Y. Chen

Abstract

Current prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been gradually losing its credibility over the last decade due to contradictory results in published literature and clinical practice. Recently, a group of potential PCa biomarkers in urine, particularly sarcosine, was found to increase significantly as the cancer progressed to metastasis. We report a simple, robust, and reproducible CE-ESI-MS/MS method for the determination of sarcosine and other representative potential biomarkers in pooled urine. The pooled urine was obtained from 20 healthy adult volunteers between the ages of 23-30 years old. A solid phase extraction (SPE) technique was optimized for maximum recovery of sarcosine. With no derivatization step, excellent resolution between sarcosine and its isomers (α-alanine and β-alanine) was achieved. A separate non-SPE method was also developed for quantitative determination of highly concentrated urinary metabolites. CE separation was performed on a positively-charged, polyethyleneimine (PEI)-coated capillary using 0.4-2% formic acid in 50% methanol. Precision for intra- and inter-day standard addition calibration of sarcosine were found to be within 15%, whereas intra-day precisions for the rest of the metabolites varied from 0.03 to 13.4%. Acceptable intra-day and inter-day accuracies, ranging from 80 to 124%, were obtained for sarcosine and the other metabolites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 23 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,622,206
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#291
of 11,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,588
of 178,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#4
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.