↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent Online Gambling: The Impact of Parental Practices and Correlates with Online Activities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Adolescent Online Gambling: The Impact of Parental Practices and Correlates with Online Activities
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10899-011-9291-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgios D. Floros, Konstantinos Siomos, Virginia Fisoun, Dimitrios Geroukalis

Abstract

We present results from a cross-sectional study of the entire adolescent student population aged 12-19 of the island of Kos and their parents, on the relationship between their Internet gambling and respective parental practices, including aspects of psychological bonding and online security measures. The sample consisted of 2,017 students (51.8% boys, 48.2% girls). Our results indicate that gender, parenting practices as perceived by the adolescents and distinct patterns of adolescent Internet activities are among the best predictor variables for Internet gambling. Security practices exercised by the parents failed to make an impact on the extent of Internet gambling, demonstrating the need for specific measures to tackle this phenomenon since the provision of simple education on the dangers of the Internet is not sufficient to this regard.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 32%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#243
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,514
of 257,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.