↓ Skip to main content

The Three Fallacies: Evaluating Three Problematic Trends in Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Social Work Journal, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
The Three Fallacies: Evaluating Three Problematic Trends in Clinical Practice
Published in
Clinical Social Work Journal, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10615-013-0441-6
Authors

Damon Krohn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 29%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 45%
Social Sciences 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,682,134
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#470
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,637
of 195,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.