↓ Skip to main content

Food and health: individual, cultural, or scientific matters?

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Food and health: individual, cultural, or scientific matters?
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12263-013-0336-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Nordström, Christian Coff, Håkan Jönsson, Lennart Nordenfelt, Ulf Görman

Abstract

In personalized nutrition, food is a tool for good health, implying an instrumental relationship between food and health. Food receives a secondary value, while health would appear to be a descriptive biological concept. This article gives an introduction to cultural understandings of food and health. The wider definition of food and health is explored in relation to the commonly used scientific approach that tends to take a more reductionist approach to food and health. The different discourses on food and health are being discussed in relation to ethical aspects of personalized nutrition. The success of personalized nutrition is likely dependent upon the ability to integrate the scientific approach with everyday cultural, emotional, ethical, and sensual understandings of food. Health theories can be divided into two principal rival types-biostatistical and holistic. Biostatistical focuses on survival, while holistic focuses on ability as a precondition for health. Arguments in favor of a holistic and individualistic theory of health and illness are presented. This implies a focus on the ability of the individual to realize his or her "vital goals." A holistic and individualistic health concept may have a reinforcing effect on the individualized approach in personalized nutrition. It allows focus on individual health premises and related dietary means of health promotion, as well as an individualized perspective on the objectives of health promotion. An individualistic notion of health also indicates that people with high levels of vital goals benefit more easily. To reach beyond these groups is likely difficult. This potential injustice should be balanced with global preventive medical programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 24%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,189,313
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#100
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,579
of 202,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.