↓ Skip to main content

Impact of inactivity and exercise on the vasculature in humans

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Impact of inactivity and exercise on the vasculature in humans
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00421-009-1260-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dick H. J. Thijssen, Andrew J. Maiorana, Gerry O’Driscoll, Nigel T. Cable, Maria T. E. Hopman, Daniel J. Green

Abstract

The effects of inactivity and exercise training on established and novel cardiovascular risk factors are relatively modest and do not account for the impact of inactivity and exercise on vascular risk. We examine evidence that inactivity and exercise have direct effects on both vasculature function and structure in humans. Physical deconditioning is associated with enhanced vasoconstrictor tone and has profound and rapid effects on arterial remodelling in both large and smaller arteries. Evidence for an effect of deconditioning on vasodilator function is less consistent. Studies of the impact of exercise training suggest that both functional and structural remodelling adaptations occur and that the magnitude and time-course of these changes depends upon training duration and intensity and the vessel beds involved. Inactivity and exercise have direct "vascular deconditioning and conditioning" effects which likely modify cardiovascular risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 6 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 358 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 14%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 61 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 28%
Sports and Recreations 86 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 74 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,061,631
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#938
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,909
of 177,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.