↓ Skip to main content

Interactive Effects of Fire, Rainfall, and Litter Quality on Decomposition in Savannas: Frequent Fire Leads to Contrasting Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactive Effects of Fire, Rainfall, and Litter Quality on Decomposition in Savannas: Frequent Fire Leads to Contrasting Effects
Published in
Ecosystems, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9657-0
Authors

Andrew B. Davies, Berndt J. van Rensburg, Paul Eggleton, Catherine L. Parr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Ecuador 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 28%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 54%
Environmental Science 26 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,265,430
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#970
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,246
of 198,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.