↓ Skip to main content

On a Method of Examining a Specified Route at Automatic Wicket Gates

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, January 1972
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On a Method of Examining a Specified Route at Automatic Wicket Gates
Published in
Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, January 1972
DOI 10.9746/sicetr1965.8.164
Authors

Masafumi TODORIKI, Hideaki KONYA, Takashi KIKUCHI, Shinobu YASUKAWA, Tsutomu KANEKO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers
#153
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,456
of 17,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.