| Title |
Is There an Added Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Sarcoidosis Patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lung, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00408-012-9432-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rik G. J. Marcellis, Antoine F. Lenssen, Geeuwke J. de Vries, Robert P. Baughman, Chris P. van der Grinten, Johny A. Verschakelen, Jolanda De Vries, Marjolein Drent |
| Abstract |
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with blood gas analysis may be helpful when there is a discrepancy between clinical findings and physiologic tests at rest. The aim of this study was to examine the added value of CPET compared to the measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in detecting impaired pulmonary gas exchange in sarcoidosis patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kuwait | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#557
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,601
of 182,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.