↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5–8 years old

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5–8 years old
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00431-016-2795-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Duncan, Susie Wilson, Jason Tallis, Emma Eyre

Abstract

This study examined the accuracy of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist worn cut-points in children aged 5-8. Fifteen children (six girls, nine boys) aged 5-8 years wore a GENEActiv monitor on their non-dominant wrist while undertaking 5 min bouts of lying supine, playing Lego, walking at slow, medium and fast pace and running. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was employed to establish how well the Phillips et al. (2013) cut-points classified intensity of the activities compared to the actual intensity determined by indirect calorimetry. Area under the curve (AUC) values were high for sedentary (.970), moderate (.815) and vigorous (.974) activity. The Phillips et al. (2013) cut-points for the GENEActiv accelerometer can be used in children aged 5-8 years old to distinguish sedentary behaviour, moderate and vigorous PA behaviour. What is Known: • Accelerometers are fast becoming the most widely used measure of physical activity in public health research. • The GENEActive wrist worn accelerometer has been validated for use with children aged 8 years and older What is New: • The GENEActive wrist worn accelerometer can be used to assess physical activity in children aged 5-8 years old. • Previously established cut-points for the GENEActiv accelerometer can be used in children aged 5-8 years old to distinguish sedentary behaviour, moderate and vigorous PA behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Other 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Unspecified 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,904,577
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#746
of 3,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,331
of 314,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.