↓ Skip to main content

Biofeedback Therapy for Dysfunctional Voiding in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Current Urology Reports, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Biofeedback Therapy for Dysfunctional Voiding in Children
Published in
Current Urology Reports, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11934-010-0166-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel F. Koenig, Patrick H. McKenna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 20%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,390,684
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#450
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,783
of 181,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.