↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a 4-week static stretch training program on passive stiffness of human gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Effects of a 4-week static stretch training program on passive stiffness of human gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit in vivo
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-2250-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masatoshi Nakamura, Tome Ikezoe, Yohei Takeno, Noriaki Ichihashi

Abstract

Static stretch is commonly used to prevent contracture and to improve joint mobility. However, it is unclear whether the components of the muscle-tendon unit are affected by a static stretch training program. This study investigated the effect of a four-week static stretch training program on the viscoelastic properties of the muscle-tendon unit and muscle. The subjects comprised 18 male participants (mean age 21.4 ± 1.7 years). The range of motion (ROM), passive torque, myotendinous junction (MTJ) displacement and, muscle fascicle length of the gastrocnemius muscle were assessed using both ultrasonography and a dynamometer while the ankle was passively dorsiflexed. After the initial test, the participants were assigned either to a group that stretched for 4 weeks (N = 9) or to a control group (N = 9). The tests were repeated after the static stretch training program. The ROM and MTJ displacement significantly increased, and the passive torque at 30° significantly decreased, in the stretching group after the study period. However, there was no significant increase in muscle fascicle length. These results suggest that a 4-week static stretch training program changes the flexibility of the overall MTU without causing concomitant changes in muscle fascicle length.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 20%
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 55 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,824
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,211
of 246,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#27
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.