| Title |
Bearing the Brunt: Co-workers’ Experiences of Work Reintegration Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-012-9380-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debra A. Dunstan, Ellen MacEachen |
| Abstract |
Work disability research has found co-worker support to be a significant but under-recognised aspect of work reintegration (WR) processes. Although co-workers work alongside returning workers, their practical contribution to WR success or failure is often invisible to others. This study aimed to gain further insight into the role and contribution of co-workers in WR interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 19% |
| Psychology | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#467
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,140
of 163,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.