↓ Skip to main content

Fallow deer (Dama dama dama) management in Roman South-East Britain

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Fallow deer (Dama dama dama) management in Roman South-East Britain
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12520-013-0120-0
Authors

Richard Madgwick, Naomi Sykes, Holly Miller, Rob Symmons, James Morris, Angela Lamb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 40%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Social Sciences 8 19%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,885,035
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#505
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,581
of 195,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.