↓ Skip to main content

Comparison and Computational Performance of Tsunami-HySEA and MOST Models for LANTEX 2013 Scenario: Impact Assessment on Puerto Rico Coasts

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Comparison and Computational Performance of Tsunami-HySEA and MOST Models for LANTEX 2013 Scenario: Impact Assessment on Puerto Rico Coasts
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00024-016-1387-8
Authors

Jorge Macías, Aurelio Mercado, José Manuel González-Vida, Sergio Ortega, Manuel Jesús Castro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 25%
Mathematics 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,608,933
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#150
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,878
of 340,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.