| Title |
Evolving instrumentation for endoscopic tumour removal of CNS tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00701-012-1561-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Senthil K. Selvanathan, Ramesh Kumar, John Goodden, Atul Tyagi, Paul Chumas |
| Abstract |
Open surgical approaches to intraventricular tumours are complex and challenging. Neuro-endoscopy, however, has enabled us to biopsy and resect small intraventricular tumours with potentially reduced morbidity. Nevertheless, suitable methods/ instrumentation for resection have limited the use of the endoscope. The authors report the utilisation of endoscopic ultrasonic aspirator in the resection of an intraventricular tumour. This technique was compared to another case that utilised conventional endoscopic techniques for removal of an intraventricular tumour. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Design | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,528
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,563
of 276,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.