| Title |
Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-010-1965-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilio Quaia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 27% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 44% |
| Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,815,444
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#631
of 4,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,039
of 100,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.