| Title |
The Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature (2004–2010)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-011-2017-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janice N. Cormier, Loren Rourke, Melissa Crosby, David Chang, Jane Armer |
| Abstract |
A systematic review of the literature was performed to examine contemporary peer-reviewed literature (2004-2010) evaluating the surgical treatment of lymphedema. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 26% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,459,243
of 22,633,606 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,734
of 6,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,389
of 123,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#11
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,633,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.