↓ Skip to main content

Evidence review of elective THR and TKR

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence review of elective THR and TKR
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/ans.12109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenson C. S. Mak, Marlene Fransen, Matthew Jennings, Lynette March, Rajat Mittal, Ian A. Harris

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence for different interventions in the preoperative, perioperative and post-operative care for people undergoing elective total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,730
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,562
of 209,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.