↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: oxidative stress reconsidered

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Commentary: oxidative stress reconsidered
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12263-009-0131-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Brigelius-Flohé

Abstract

All definitions of the terms 'oxidative stress' and 'antioxidants' implicate that oxidants are just damaging. However, there is increasing evidence that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are not only toxic but that we need them for healthy life. This change in paradigm has been discussed at the third international symposium on 'Nutrition, oxygen biology and medicine-micronutrients, exercise, energy and aging disorders', of the Society for Free Radical Research France and the Oxygen Club of California on April 8-10, 2009 in Paris. The beneficial effect of a low to moderate concentration of oxidants produced during exercise was taken as most discussed example. In this case, ROS are required for normal force production in skeletal muscle, for the development of training-induced adaptation in endurance performance, as well as for the induction of endogenous defense systems. Taking antioxidants during training prevents adaptation. Although substantial progress on the understanding of the physiological functions of ROS was communicated at the meeting, it remained obvious that a lot of work is needed to fully understand the conditions and individual situations under which ROS are beneficial or detrimental.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 62 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,380,136
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#183
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,375
of 109,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.