↓ Skip to main content

Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Brack, Valeria Dulio, Marlene Ågerstrand, Ian Allan, Rolf Altenburger, Markus Brinkmann, Dirk Bunke, Robert M. Burgess, Ian Cousins, Beate I. Escher, Félix J. Hernández, L. Mark Hewitt, Klára Hilscherová, Juliane Hollender, Henner Hollert, Robert Kase, Bernd Klauer, Claudia Lindim, David López Herráez, Cécil Miège, John Munthe, Simon O'Toole, Leo Posthuma, Heinz Rüdel, Ralf B. Schäfer, Manfred Sengl, Foppe Smedes, Dik van de Meent, Paul J. van den Brink, Jos van Gils, Annemarie P. van Wezel, A. Dick Vethaak, Etienne Vermeirssen, Peter C. von der Ohe, Branislav Vrana

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 426 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 19%
Researcher 74 17%
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 89 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 117 27%
Chemistry 40 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 9%
Engineering 36 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 129 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#975,116
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,303
of 30,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,090
of 325,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#22
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.