↓ Skip to main content

Depression and treatment response: dynamic interplay of signaling pathways and altered neural processes

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Depression and treatment response: dynamic interplay of signaling pathways and altered neural processes
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00018-012-1020-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanja Duric, Ronald S. Duman

Abstract

Since the 1960s, when the first tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressant drugs were introduced, most of the ensuing agents were designed to target similar brain pathways that elevate serotonin and/or norepinephrine signaling. Fifty years later, the main goal of the current depression research is to develop faster-acting, more effective therapeutic agents with fewer side effects, as currently available antidepressants are plagued by delayed therapeutic onset and low response rates. Clinical and basic science research studies have made significant progress towards deciphering the pathophysiological events within the brain involved in development, maintenance, and treatment of major depressive disorder. Imaging and postmortem brain studies in depressed human subjects, in combination with animal behavioral models of depression, have identified a number of different cellular events, intracellular signaling pathways, proteins, and target genes that are modulated by stress and are potentially vital mediators of antidepressant action. In this review, we focus on several neural mechanisms, primarily within the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, which have recently been implicated in depression and treatment response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Neuroscience 18 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Psychology 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,591,533
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,602
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,229
of 165,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.