↓ Skip to main content

Is Diabetes Mellitus a Heart Disease Equivalent in Women?

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Diabetes Mellitus a Heart Disease Equivalent in Women?
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, March 2013
DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.966986
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori B. Daniels, Deborah Grady, Lori Mosca, Peter Collins, Bruce H. Mitlak, Messan G. Amewou-Atisso, Nanette K. Wenger, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor

Abstract

Several studies have concluded that diabetes mellitus and heart disease carry similar risk for future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most of these studies were too small to quantify independent risks specific to women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diabetes mellitus is a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent for prediction of future CHD and CVD events in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#1,196
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,047
of 208,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.