↓ Skip to main content

Nucleation and growth kinetics of struvite crystallization

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nucleation and growth kinetics of struvite crystallization
Published in
Water Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chirag M. Mehta, Damien J. Batstone

Abstract

Struvite crystallization technology is being widely applied in full-scale due to a surge in nutrient demand and phosphate price increases. Past investigations on struvite crystallization focused on process efficiency and thermodynamics, and less on kinetics, while mainly using fluidized bed type crystallizer. In this work, nucleation and growth kinetic data were measured using stirred vessel. The primary and secondary nucleation was measured in synthetic wastewater, and crystal growth in digested supernatant. The measured kinetic data was correlated with solution supersaturation. The dependence of growth rate on relative supersaturation in the digested was higher compared to synthetic wastewater. The crystal polymorph in synthetic wastewater and real wastewater was comparable. Products from the growth studies showed narrow size distribution and favorable separation characteristics. The secondary nucleation rate showed second order dependence on relative supersaturation. The nucleation induction time decreased with an increase in supersaturation ratio with a clear distinction between homogenous and heterogeneous primary nucleation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 228 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 26%
Environmental Science 48 20%
Chemical Engineering 27 11%
Chemistry 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 55 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#9,084
of 11,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,886
of 210,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#46
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.