| Title |
Inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Angiogenesis, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10456-014-9416-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shan Liao, Pierre-Yves von der Weid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 16% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,349,664
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#440
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,234
of 306,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.