| Title |
Neonatal Gastrointestinal Perforations: the 10-Year Experience of a Reference Hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Surgery, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12262-016-1565-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehmet Saraç, Ünal Bakal, Mustafa Aydın, Tugay Tartar, Aysen Orman, Erdal Taşkın, Şenay Canpolat, Ahmet Kazez |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to present our experiences with, as well as the factors that affect, the treatment and outcome of patients with neonatal gastrointestinal perforations (GIPs). Thirty-eight newborn cases that were operated on for GIP in our hospital's tertiary newborn intensive care unit between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into the two following groups: group 1, perforations related to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and group 2, non-NEC perforations. In total, 38 patients (16 males, 22 females) participated in this study. The perforations were related to NEC in 12 patients (group 1; 31.6 %), and the other 26 patients (group 2; 68.4 %) were classified as non-NEC perforation cases. The incidence of neonatal GIP was 0.53 % in all newborn patients, while the incidence of perforation in NEC cases was 20 %. Of all patients, 25 (65.7 %) were premature. Non-NEC pathologies were the most common cause of GIP (68.4 %) and included stomach perforation related to a nasogastric catheter (n = 5), volvulus (n = 4), intestinal atresia (n = 3), esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 2), cystic fibrosis (n = 2), Hirschprung's disease (n = 2), appendicitis (n = 2), congenital stomach anterior wall weakness (n = 1), duplication cyst (n = 1), invagination (n = 1), incarcerated inguinal hernia (n = 1), and idiopathic causes (n = 2). Primary surgical repair was performed in all cases without a conservative approach. The mortality rate related to GIP in newborn cases was 47.3 %. While the mortality rate in group 1 was 66.6 %, it was statistically insignificantly lower in group 2 (38.4 %) (p > 0.05). In group 1, the mortality rate of those with intestinal and colorectal perforations was 45.6 and 20 %, respectively (p > 0.05). Non-NEC pathologies are the most frequent causes of GIP in newborns, and primary surgical repair is the primary treatment choice for neonatal GIP. However, GIP remains one of the most significant causes of mortality in newborns. While the prognosis for neonatal colon perforation is good, that for stomach and jejunoileal perforations is worse. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Surgery
#373
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,364
of 314,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Surgery
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.