↓ Skip to main content

Observational Diagnostics of Gas in Protoplanetary Disks

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Observational Diagnostics of Gas in Protoplanetary Disks
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11038-009-9347-2
Authors

Andrés Carmona

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 83%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,820,724
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#56
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,800
of 174,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them