↓ Skip to main content

Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model
Published in
Public Choice, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11127-010-9644-3
Authors

Toke S. Aidt, Francisco José Veiga, Linda Gonçalves Veiga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 135 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59 41%
Social Sciences 26 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 10%
Unspecified 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,427,158
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#630
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,657
of 104,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.