↓ Skip to main content

Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-2903-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Nakajima, Yutaka Saito, Shinji Tanaka, Hiroyasu Iishi, Shin-ei Kudo, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Masahiro Igarashi, Yuusuke Saitoh, Yuji Inoue, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Takashi Hisasbe, Takahisa Matsuda, Hideki Ishikawa, Ken-ichi Sugihara

Abstract

Conventional endoscopic resection (CER) for early colorectal neoplasia (CRN) is widely accepted as a minimally invasive treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed in Japan to resect larger lesions, but ESD was not covered by the Japanese national health insurance until April 2012. In addition, treatment strategies vary considerably among medical facilities. To evaluate the current situation in Japan regarding endoscopic treatment of CRNs measuring ≥20 mm, we conducted a prospective multicenter study at 18 medium-volume and high-volume specialized facilities in cooperation with the Japan Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 28 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,944,011
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,527
of 6,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,617
of 198,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#36
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.