↓ Skip to main content

A descriptive survey of cancer helplines in the United Kingdom: Who they are, the services offered, and the accessibility of those services

Overview of attention for article published in Psycho-Oncology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A descriptive survey of cancer helplines in the United Kingdom: Who they are, the services offered, and the accessibility of those services
Published in
Psycho-Oncology, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/pon.4293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine M. Leydon, Beth Stuart, Lisa Danquah, Katie Ekberg, Lucy Brindle, Sue Latter, Clare Moynihan, Peter Salmon, Sonia Howe, Elizabeth Stokoe, Paul Little

Abstract

There are over 1500 UK health helplines in operation, yet we have scant knowledge about the resources in place to support the seeking and delivering of cancer-related telephone help and support. This research aimed to identify and describe cancer and cancer-related helpline service provision: the number of helplines available, the variety of services provided and accessibility of those services. Online national questionnaire survey sent to 95 cancer and cancer-related helplines in the UK RESULTS: 69 (73%) of 95 surveyed cancer and cancer-related helplines completed the survey. Most helplines/organisations were registered charities, supported by donations. 73.5% of helplines had national coverage. Most helplines served all age groups, ethnic groups, and men and women. Only 13.4% had a number that was free from landlines and most mobile networks and 56.6% could only be contacted during working hours. Over 50% of helplines reported no provisions for callers with additional needs. 55% had no clinical staff available to callers. Ongoing support and training for helpline staff was available but variable. While cancer helplines in the UK offer reasonably broad coverage across the country, there are still potential barriers to accessibility. There are also opportunities to optimise the training of staff/volunteers across the sector. There are further prospects for helplines to enhance services and sustain appropriate and realistic quality standards.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Psychology 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,499,054
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Psycho-Oncology
#1,638
of 2,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,769
of 427,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psycho-Oncology
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.