| Title |
Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-016-1238-2 |
| Authors |
David Watson, Luciano Floridi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 30% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 25% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 7 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 28% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,197,972
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#61
of 2,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,762
of 322,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.