↓ Skip to main content

The range and diversity of providers’ viewpoints towards the Iraqi primary health care system: an exploration using Q-methodology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The range and diversity of providers’ viewpoints towards the Iraqi primary health care system: an exploration using Q-methodology
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nazar P Shabila, Namir G Al-Tawil, Tariq S Al-Hadithi, Egbert Sondorp

Abstract

The increasingly recognized need for reorganizing the primary health care services in Iraq calls for a comprehensive assessment of the system to better understand its problems and needs for development. As part of such comprehensive assessment and due to the important role of primary health care providers in adopting any change, we ought to explore the range and diversity of viewpoints of primary health care providers towards the Iraqi primary health care system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Thailand 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,182
of 17,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,433
of 210,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#127
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.