↓ Skip to main content

On a Question of Erdős and Ulam

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
On a Question of Erdős and Ulam
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00454-009-9179-x
Authors

Jozsef Solymosi, Frank de Zeeuw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,563,106
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#73
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,723
of 93,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them