↓ Skip to main content

Cyber Bullying and Internalizing Difficulties: Above and Beyond the Impact of Traditional Forms of Bullying

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
389 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
545 Mendeley
Title
Cyber Bullying and Internalizing Difficulties: Above and Beyond the Impact of Traditional Forms of Bullying
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rina A. Bonanno, Shelley Hymel

Abstract

Although recent research has demonstrated significant links between involvement in cyber bullying and various internalizing difficulties, there exists debate as to whether these links are independent of involvement in more traditional forms of bullying. The present study systematically examined the association between involvement in cyber bullying, as either a victim or a bully, and both depressive symptomatology and suicidal ideation. Self-report data were collected from 399 (57% female) Canadian adolescents in grades 8-10 (mean age = 14.2 years, SD = .91 years). Results indicated that involvement in cyber bullying, as either a victim or a bully, uniquely contributed to the prediction of both depressive symptomatology and suicidal ideation, over and above the contribution of involvement in traditional forms of bullying (physical, verbal, relational). Given the ever increasing rate of accessibility to technology in both schools and homes, these finding underscore the importance of addressing cyber bullying, with respect to both research and intervention, as a unique phenomenon with equally unique challenges for students, parents, school administrators and researchers alike.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 532 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 16%
Student > Bachelor 82 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 13%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 83 15%
Unknown 129 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 178 33%
Social Sciences 76 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 6%
Arts and Humanities 25 5%
Computer Science 22 4%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 150 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#707,936
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#119
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,760
of 213,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.