| Title |
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fergus Davnall, Connie S. P. Yip, Gunnar Ljungqvist, Mariyah Selmi, Francesca Ng, Bal Sanghera, Balaji Ganeshan, Kenneth A. Miles, Gary J. Cook, Vicky Goh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 533 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 21% |
| Researcher | 80 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 113 | 21% |
| Unknown | 111 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 37% |
| Engineering | 63 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 43 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 9% |
| Unknown | 139 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,941,046
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#225
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,025
of 186,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.