↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by Lactobacillus isolated from fine cocoa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by Lactobacillus isolated from fine cocoa
Published in
BMC Microbiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0871-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tauá Alves Melo, Thalis Ferreira dos Santos, Milena Evangelista de Almeida, Luiz Alberto Gusmão Fontes Junior, Ewerton Ferraz Andrade, Rachel Passos Rezende, Lucas Miranda Marques, Carla Cristina Romano

Abstract

Biofilm production represents an important virulence and pathogenesis factor for Staphylococcus aureus. The formation of biofilms on medical devices is a major concern in hospital environments, as they can become a constant source of infection. Probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus fermentum and L. plantarum, have been found to inhibit biofilm formation; however little is known about the underlying mechanism. In this study, we tested the activity of supernatants produced by L. fermentum TCUESC01 and L. plantarum TCUESC02, isolated during the fermentation of fine cocoa, against S. aureus CCMB262 biofilm production. We measured inhibition of biofilm formation in vitro and analyzed biofilm structure by confocal and electronic microscopy. Additionally, we quantified the expression of S. aureus genes icaA and icaR involved in the synthesis of the biofilm matrix by real-time PCR. Both Lactobacillus supernatants inhibited S. aureus growth. However, only L. fermentum TCUESC01 significantly reduced the thickness of the biofilm, from 14 μm to 2.83 μm (at 18 mg∙mL(-1), 90 % of the minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC), 3.12 μm (at 14 mg∙mL(-1), 70 % of the MIC), and 5.21 μm (at 10 mg∙mL(-1), 50 % of the MIC). Additionally, L. fermentum TCUESC01 supernatant modulated the expression of icaA and icaR. L. fermentum TCUESC01 reduces the formation of S. aureus biofilm under subinhibitory conditions. Inhibition of biofilm production probably depends on modulation of the ica operon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 44 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 53 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,245
of 3,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,854
of 316,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#20
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.